New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Do you have any plans to support CloudKit in the future (version 9.x.x?) #445
Comments
Just to clarify, CloudKit was never supported in Core Store. What was removed in 6.x.x was support for iCloud Storage (i.e. |
So may I ask what is " CloudKit support" for which mentioned in road map section? Prototyping stage |
@CocodingLee Those are planned features but are in feasibility testing (thus Prototyping stage). At this point, CloudKit support is still unlikely since I am currently still playing with Widget/Extension shared stores (app groups) |
@JohnEstropia I think what people are looking for, at a minimum, is the support of |
@thebarndog Yes, I do understand that, but it's not as simple as just switching to
Now the thing is, CoreStore's feature development had been based on the features I needed in my own projects. If CoreStore had more sponsors requesting for new features, I would have prioritized them against my other earning projects. That said, I also want this be published as soon as I can, and I actually have to plan my other projects to support CloudKit sync just to have a playground for CoreStore. |
I don't think that's true though. I have an app thats not using persistent history tracking, just |
I'd have to look into that again then, because there are issues like this before: https://developer.apple.com/forums/thread/120328 This may have been improved in recent iOS versions so I'll investigate again. In any case, CloudKit stores still have restrictions that will break CoreStore's existing API (ex: limited migrations, limited attribute types) and need to be separated. |
Interested in CloudKit too |
at version 6.x.x delete CloudKit features , why ? and is there any plans to support it in future version , such as version 9.x.x ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: