New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Using QUIC to transfer data #1387
Comments
Thanks for reaching out! Outline Client supports connecting to QUIC traffic, which is based on UDP, but shadowsocks uses its own format to tunnel data, not QUIC or UDP. |
Yes, I hope to use quic as the main transmission protocol, tcp is too slow, and I hope to better break through the firewall, such as China. |
I hope to launch a beta version of the QUIC protocol outline soon. |
Very exciting! We're working to integrate the new Outline SDK into Outline Client, so ideally any new protocols would be housed in the SDK. If you're interested in contributing to the code, please let us know so we can discuss how to make that happen! |
Use QUIC to transfer data, QUIC is faster, TCP is slower, YouTube and Google sites already support HTTP2 QUIC HTTP3 access.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: