New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Copy-pasted docs means many derives are still undocumented! #348
Labels
Comments
Yeah, that's indeed the case. I don't think it's worth the effort to provide specific docs for each, but it would probably be good to prefix those docs with something like:
|
Not a blocker, though. |
@TheLostLambda feel free to provide a PR to update the docs |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
A blocker for 1.0.0, I'd imagine, but shouldn't be too hard to fix!
I found Not / Neg first: https://docs.rs/derive_more/1.0.0-beta.6/derive_more/derive.Neg.html
But it seems to be a broader trend when things are part of the same feature!
https://docs.rs/derive_more/1.0.0-beta.6/derive_more/derive.BitAnd.html
... and presumably more!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: