-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 83
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Compatibility with GeometryBasics? #401
Comments
first i heard of geometrybasics.jl. can you elaborate on the benefits of adding that as a dependency? |
It’s the new attempt to unify geometry types. For almost every drawing library geometry types are redefined, we started making our own for the library were making, but realized it might be more beneficial to use another library to handle geometry types(we would like to probably use compose to draw images). If the geometry types were the same it would be easier to use one standard geometry set of types. It’s still somewhat new trying to address this problem, so I thought I’d bring it up. |
Has there been any thought on making this package work with GeometryBasics types? It would provide a more consistent and cohesive ecosystem for creating shapes and being able to draw them.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: