-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
frrinit.sh - OSPF6 Unknown command: agentx #15896
Comments
Do you have |
in frr.conf
|
Have you tried adding |
So I haven't tried that, but I thought that option would be cancelled. Plus I love the unified config - frr.conf. Otherwise everything works fine for me - I just wanted to point out that this is how it behaves on startup. Isn't the solution to address this in the source code? https://github.com/FRRouting/frr/releases/tag/frr-10.0 |
If you had a situation where an operator turned on ospfd with snmp but not ospf6d and agentx was configured then you get into a situation where ospf6d would complain that the config for agentx did not exist. Let's modify the code to allow this situation to happen. Fixes: FRRouting#15896 Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <[email protected]>
If you had a situation where an operator turned on ospfd with snmp but not ospf6d and agentx was configured then you get into a situation where ospf6d would complain that the config for agentx did not exist. Let's modify the code to allow this situation to happen. Fixes: FRRouting#15896 Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <[email protected]>
If you had a situation where an operator turned on ospfd with snmp but not ospf6d and agentx was configured then you get into a situation where ospf6d would complain that the config for agentx did not exist. Let's modify the code to allow this situation to happen. Fixes: FRRouting#15896 Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <[email protected]>
If you had a situation where an operator turned on ospfd with snmp but not ospf6d and agentx was configured then you get into a situation where ospf6d would complain that the config for agentx did not exist. Let's modify the code to allow this situation to happen. Fixes: #15896 Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit 73ad64a) # Conflicts: # ldpd/ldpd.c
If you had a situation where an operator turned on ospfd with snmp but not ospf6d and agentx was configured then you get into a situation where ospf6d would complain that the config for agentx did not exist. Let's modify the code to allow this situation to happen. Fixes: FRRouting#15896 Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <[email protected]>
It's more of a cosmetic issue, but I'm just pointing it out.
If I use this snmp configuration for both daemons everything is fine:
But if I want to use snmp only for OSPFv2:
I get this warning when FRR starts:
Tested on Debian 12 + Arch Linux and FRR 10.0.
Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: