-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
about running #6
Comments
My code is based on specific version of pcdet, and we do not test the code on other versions. |
What's the error log information when you run the attack.py directly? |
tks for reply,i can run attack.py successfully,i just want to make sure if pcdet's version affect the final result.Is there any changed in your pcdet like eval.py?I can get similar result to your paper right now
…---Original---
From: "Yifan ***@***.***>
Date: Sat, Dec 7, 2024 10:40 AM
To: ***@***.***>;
Cc: ***@***.***>;"State ***@***.***>;
Subject: Re: [Eaphan/Robust3DOD] about running (Issue #6)
What's the error log information when you run the attack.py directly?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you modified the open/close state.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Thank you for your work,sir.
After confirming that the dataset and .pth file , I cannot run attack.py directly using the environment code you provided. However, I can run attack.py on my own configured OpenPCDet after properly setting up the relevant files. I noticed that some files related to PCDet have slight differences compared to those in your code, which might be due to using different versions of PCDet (I'm not sure). Could you confirm whether there is any difference between the two? Is your work mainly focused on the three .py files?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: