Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DNT-policy is too permissive in certain cases #29

Open
bfg1981 opened this issue Apr 25, 2018 · 0 comments
Open

DNT-policy is too permissive in certain cases #29

bfg1981 opened this issue Apr 25, 2018 · 0 comments

Comments

@bfg1981
Copy link

bfg1981 commented Apr 25, 2018

After being caught up in the net of being tracking services we posted the /.well-known/dnt-policy.txt and are perfectly fine with it for some services. However for other services we have a very simple policy. We do not track ever unless there are specific technical reasons we need to. Of course we are in compliance with the posted policy, but having such a permissive policy seems to suggest that we are doing a lot less to protect users privacy than we are actually doing. We would suggest two additional policies in addition to the Do Not Track Compliance Policy.

Do not track policy.

Outline:
We do not track you unless we have specific technical reasons.

This is the policy we would like to use.

Do not track policy - strict.

Outline:
We do not track you.

We think this too strict and difficult to follow through in practice, but it should exist as an option.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant