Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

DOC107: Prefer 'see cref' to inline code #15

Closed
jnm2 opened this issue Sep 14, 2018 · 1 comment
Closed

DOC107: Prefer 'see cref' to inline code #15

jnm2 opened this issue Sep 14, 2018 · 1 comment
Assignees
@sharwell
Labels
analyzer fixed
Milestone
1.0.0 Beta

Comments

@jnm2
Copy link

jnm2 commented Sep 14, 2018

Good reminder to folks so that their names don't drift over time. (Probably the most common thing I see.)
@sharwell sharwell changed the title Warn if type or member could be written with cref Prefer 'see cref' to inline code Sep 15, 2018
@sharwell sharwell mentioned this issue Sep 15, 2018
Open
@sharwell
Copy link
Member

sharwell commented Sep 15, 2018 •
edited
Loading

I split this issue similar to the way I split them for other types of references.

Offer to convert <c>TypeOrMember</c> to <see cref="TypeOrMember"/>.

Related to #29

@sharwell sharwell changed the title Prefer 'see cref' to inline code DOC107: Prefer 'see cref' to inline code Sep 19, 2018
@sharwell sharwell added this to the 1.0.0 Beta milestone Sep 20, 2018
@sharwell sharwell mentioned this issue Sep 21, 2018
Open
sharwell added a commit to sharwell/DocumentationAnalyzers that referenced this issue Sep 21, 2018
@sharwell
Add inline code analyzers
cb28d6f 
Closes DotNetAnalyzers#5
Closes DotNetAnalyzers#15
Closes DotNetAnalyzers#24
Closes DotNetAnalyzers#25
@sharwell sharwell mentioned this issue Sep 21, 2018
Merged
@sharwell sharwell self-assigned this Sep 21, 2018
sharwell added a commit to sharwell/DocumentationAnalyzers that referenced this issue Sep 21, 2018
@sharwell
Add inline code analyzers
bcf0238 
Closes DotNetAnalyzers#5
Closes DotNetAnalyzers#15
Closes DotNetAnalyzers#24
Closes DotNetAnalyzers#25
@sharwell sharwell mentioned this issue Aug 9, 2019
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@sharwell sharwell

Labels
analyzer fixed
Projects
None yet
Milestone
1.0.0 Beta
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@sharwell @jnm2