Feature names are ambiguous

[00sapo]

To have clearly understandable names, we should define a specific format from which the largest number of information can be gathered. An easy way could be to call them according to a format like:

[module].[FirstOrder|SecondOrder].[Part|Score|Sound].[NameOfPartOrSoundOr-].[Boolean|Int|Float|String].[NameOfFeatureWithoutThePreviousStrings]

e.g.:

SoundVoice_Intervalm3_Per -> interval.2.Sound.Voice.Float.m3_per

where interval, Sound, and Voice are now more well-defined and consequently more meaningful, while 2 and Float are added

[martianbug]

mm yep, sounds like an improvement. Do u think its worth the efforto, or if data its gonna be more usable for data analysis?

[00sapo]

Not sure, but this would ultimately help the selection of certain features because it's a clearer format (users can define regex easily) and a better format for pandas API (it works well with multicolumns).

I would leave it here for remembering in future