Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improper shading used within node #1244

Open
1 task done
RobotHanzo opened this issue Jun 3, 2023 · 2 comments
Open
1 task done

Improper shading used within node #1244

RobotHanzo opened this issue Jun 3, 2023 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
p: high This issue or pull request has a high priority. s: confirmed The described bug was reported multiple times and/or is reproduceable t: bug Something isn't working as intended v: 4.X This pull should be included in the 4.0 release

Comments

@RobotHanzo
Copy link
Contributor

Stacktrace

No response

Actions to reproduce

  1. Open a new project (not inside the original cloudnet project)
  2. Use the driver and node dependency in build.gradle
  3. Try and use a method in driver, browse the source using IDEA
  4. The docstrings and comments are gone, and it uses node jar for the sources instead

CloudNet version

[03.06 23:12:54.195] INFO:
[03.06 23:12:54.195] INFO: CloudNet Blizzard 4.0.0-RC9-SNAPSHOT 1619e68
[03.06 23:12:54.195] INFO: Discord: https://discord.cloudnetservice.eu/
[03.06 23:12:54.195] INFO:
[03.06 23:12:54.195] INFO: ClusterId: 2e8f442a--41f4--861d5dfef0a4
[03.06 23:12:54.195] INFO: NodeId: Node-1
[03.06 23:12:54.195] INFO: Head-NodeId: Node-1
[03.06 23:12:54.195] INFO: CPU usage: (P/S) .16/20.16/100%
[03.06 23:12:54.195] INFO: Node services memory allocation (U/R/M): 11776/11776/63803 MB
[03.06 23:12:54.195] INFO: Threads: 100
[03.06 23:12:54.195] INFO: Heap usage: 62/256MB
[03.06 23:12:54.195] INFO: JVM: Private Build 17 (OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 17.0.7+7-Ubuntu-0ubuntu120.04)
[03.06 23:12:54.195] INFO: Update Repo: CloudNetService/launchermeta, Update Branch: nightly
[03.06 23:12:54.195] INFO:

Other

When we use the node dependency
image
When we don't use it
image

A potential solution would be to relocate the dependencies instead of directly shading it with the shadow plugin, to avoid conflicts like this

Issue uniqueness

  • Yes, this issue is unique. There are no similar issues.
@RobotHanzo RobotHanzo added s: needs triage Issue waiting for triage t: bug Something isn't working as intended labels Jun 3, 2023
@RobotHanzo RobotHanzo changed the title The shaded JAR was published instead of the original one Improper shading used within node Jun 3, 2023
@0utplay 0utplay added s: confirmed The described bug was reported multiple times and/or is reproduceable and removed s: needs triage Issue waiting for triage labels Jun 18, 2023
@DasBabyPixel
Copy link

Just to add here, relocating sounds like nonsense because then we would have no way to generate correct sources.
The simple but correct (I think) solution should be to just not publish shaded jars and use the original jars for publishing.
If shaded jars are required in the repository, then doing it with a classifier (node-shaded.jar) might be the best solution.
Just +1 for this because it is indeed pretty annoying

@derklaro
Copy link
Member

Just to put it here: the current gradle setup is pretty fragile anyway (mostly) due to fabric and issues with dependencies that need to be shaded. I will take a look into properly fixing it, but it might take a while - just FYI.

@derklaro derklaro added p: high This issue or pull request has a high priority. v: 4.X This pull should be included in the 4.0 release labels Aug 23, 2023
@derklaro derklaro self-assigned this Aug 23, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
p: high This issue or pull request has a high priority. s: confirmed The described bug was reported multiple times and/or is reproduceable t: bug Something isn't working as intended v: 4.X This pull should be included in the 4.0 release
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants