Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add the photo release form to the repo/wiki #5

Open
k4y3ff opened this issue Sep 28, 2014 · 7 comments
Open

Add the photo release form to the repo/wiki #5

k4y3ff opened this issue Sep 28, 2014 · 7 comments

Comments

@k4y3ff
Copy link
Member

k4y3ff commented Sep 28, 2014

I'd like to propose we add the photo release form to the organizing repo/wiki.

At other tech events, I have seen organizers and/or volunteers take photos of women, then post them to Twitter, Facebook, or the official event website--all without prior consent. I have then heard from the women in those photographs, who often feel deeply uncomfortable but do not want to seem ungrateful, especially if the events were free and/or helpful. So, rather than confront the organizers, these women will simply avoid recommending the events to other people, as well as avoid attending all events run by the same staff.

So, I think it's super-important that we make the photo release form available somewhere in this repo. Even if that isn't possible for legal reasons (or something), the photo release form should still be mentioned throughout the wiki, especially in the list of Installfest tasks for organizers. The photo release form should be presented to all ClojureBridge attendees as soon as they sign in at the installfest, and if photos will be taken of volunteers, the photo release form should be presented to all ClojureBridge volunteers at both the T.A. training and installfest.

Similarly, I think it's super-important that, at future T.A. trainings, volunteers be directed not to take photos of the event unless they know who, exactly, has opted into having their photos taken--because it's important to recognize that attendees do not "opt out" of having their photos taken; they opt in.

And, finally, I think that the photo release form should add options for which parts of the event attendees would feel comfortable being photographed at. If I were a public schoolteacher, for example, I would probably feel comfortable being photographed at the installfest and workshop, but may not feel comfortable being photographed at the bar afterwards.

@bridgethillyer
Copy link
Member

Sounds good to me.

@seancorfield
Copy link
Contributor

It's available on this page https://github.com/ClojureBridge/organizing/wiki/Templates-and-Materials as a link to a Google Doc. We probably ought to create a PDF tho' for ease of printing?

@bridgethillyer
Copy link
Member

Posted something to the workshops list to start a discussion there.

https://groups.google.com/d/msg/clojurebridge-workshops/DUyGYiApPzc/QUr881vvQsIJ

@k4y3ff
Copy link
Member Author

k4y3ff commented Sep 28, 2014

Possibly? The media release might be more helpful as a Google Doc, even though it's read-only, because you can download Google Docs in multiple formats.

I still think we should put links to it in more relevant places than just that page, though, especially given that it's called a "media release." Aside from being hard to find via the browsing through the wiki, search engines don't pick it up very well since the words "photo," "photograph," "picture," etc. are not associated with it on this site. It might be better to switch the name to "Photo/Media Release," or include a description beneath the link specifying that the media release does, in fact, refer to photos taken at ClojureBridge events.

Also, thanks, Bridget!

@seancorfield
Copy link
Contributor

The wiki isn't easy to find for organizers anyway right now (based on past experience) so we definitely need a way to surface that page more visibility so folks can find it. So, yes, I agree, and I think it's a bigger problem than just the media release form.

@jvns
Copy link

jvns commented Sep 29, 2014

Here's what we did at !!Con:
photo policy

@jvns
Copy link

jvns commented Sep 29, 2014

In practice most people wore green nametags, and some significant fraction wore yellow and red (enough that it didn't feel weird or like anyone was being singled out).

This also has the excellent property that if you accidentally take a picture of someone with a red / yellow nametag without asking, then you can possibly notice just by looking at the picture.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants