You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There seems to be a need to have a user role that can edit committee information and manage membership for all committees, but without permission to alter the seats and terms.
Setting up the seats and terms is something that needs to be done carefully and must conform with municipal code.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The consensus among city staff has been that Liaisons should not be the people who appoint board members. It sounds like there should be a role for something like "Appointers". These people would manage board membership as well as make sure seats and terms were set up correctly.
The "Appointer" role might need to be department based. I don't think we want to manage "Appointers" for every board and commission.
inghamn
changed the title
User role between Staff and Liaison
New user role between Staff and Liaison
Mar 28, 2024
Setting up seats can and probably should be an administrator role. This is very rare and needs to be done correctly.
Appointers have been 1-2 people in OOTM and Council/Clerks office, adding new appointees made by OOTM or Council. This shouldn't be a role for every department.
Board setup/config are different from appointing people.
There seems to be a need to have a user role that can edit committee information and manage membership for all committees, but without permission to alter the seats and terms.
Setting up the seats and terms is something that needs to be done carefully and must conform with municipal code.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: