Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[BUG] runtime behavior is not same as specs #31625

Open
weidongxu-microsoft opened this issue Nov 21, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

[BUG] runtime behavior is not same as specs #31625

weidongxu-microsoft opened this issue Nov 21, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
bug This issue requires a change to an existing behavior in the product in order to be resolved. Mgmt This issue is related to a management-plane library.

Comments

@weidongxu-microsoft
Copy link
Member

API Spec link

"properties": {
"startDate": {
"format": "date-time",
"description": "The start date of the enrollment.",
"type": "string"
},

API Spec version

2024-04-01

Describe the bug

See Azure/azure-sdk-for-java#43029 (comment)

The response of the startDate is now 6/1/2023 12:00:00 AM +00:00, which is not RFC3339.

Expected behavior

Date-time be RFC3339, if not specified otherwise.

Actual behavior

6/1/2023 12:00:00 AM +00:00, which is not RFC3339.

Reproduction Steps

call https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/rest/api/billing/billing-accounts/get?view=rest-billing-2024-04-01&tabs=HTTP

Environment

No response

@weidongxu-microsoft weidongxu-microsoft added the bug This issue requires a change to an existing behavior in the product in order to be resolved. label Nov 21, 2024
@v-jiaodi v-jiaodi added the Mgmt This issue is related to a management-plane library. label Nov 21, 2024
@v-jiaodi
Copy link
Member

@bradenwatkins Please help take a look, thanks.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug This issue requires a change to an existing behavior in the product in order to be resolved. Mgmt This issue is related to a management-plane library.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants