Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feat/matebarabas/spec-link-updates #1747

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 3, 2024

Conversation

matebarabas
Copy link
Contributor

Overview/Summary

Updating links across the AVM repo to leverage the new specification pages.

As part of this Pull Request I have

  • Read the Contribution Guide and ensured this PR is compliant with the guide
  • Checked for duplicate Pull Requests
  • Associated it with relevant GitHub Issues or ADO Work Items (Internal Only)
  • Ensured my code/branch is up-to-date with the latest changes in the main branch
  • Ensured PR tests are passing
  • Updated relevant and associated documentation (e.g. Contribution Guide, Docs etc.)

@matebarabas matebarabas requested a review from a team as a code owner December 3, 2024 23:13
@matebarabas matebarabas self-assigned this Dec 3, 2024
@matebarabas matebarabas added the Type: Documentation 📄 Improvements or additions to documentation label Dec 3, 2024
@microsoft-github-policy-service microsoft-github-policy-service bot added the Needs: Triage 🔍 Maintainers need to triage still label Dec 3, 2024

Important

The "Needs: Triage 🔍" label must be removed once the triage process is complete!

Tip

For additional guidance on how to triage this issue/PR, see the AVM Issue Triage documentation.

@matebarabas matebarabas merged commit 8b6dfbf into main Dec 3, 2024
4 checks passed
@matebarabas matebarabas deleted the feat/matebarabas/spec-link-updates branch December 3, 2024 23:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Needs: Triage 🔍 Maintainers need to triage still Type: Documentation 📄 Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants