-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 227
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
test: Fast tests for blocks and proofs landing on various slot combinations #9809
Labels
Comments
spalladino
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 8, 2024
De-enshrines the following constants and turns them into config: ``` ETHEREUM_SLOT_DURATION = 12; AZTEC_SLOT_DURATION = 24; AZTEC_EPOCH_DURATION = 16; AZTEC_TARGET_COMMITTEE_SIZE = 48; AZTEC_EPOCH_PROOF_CLAIM_WINDOW_IN_L2_SLOTS = 13; ``` These can now be set via env vars. On L1, they are set as immutable variables across all contracts that require them. As for circuits, none of them was needed, except for the epoch duration to be able to dimension the fees array. This was handled by introducing a new MAX_EPOCH_DURATION constant (32) which sets the max length of the array. This is a prerequisite to #9809
spalladino
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 8, 2024
De-enshrines the following constants and turns them into config: ``` ETHEREUM_SLOT_DURATION = 12; AZTEC_SLOT_DURATION = 24; AZTEC_EPOCH_DURATION = 16; AZTEC_TARGET_COMMITTEE_SIZE = 48; AZTEC_EPOCH_PROOF_CLAIM_WINDOW_IN_L2_SLOTS = 13; ``` These can now be set via env vars. On L1, they are set as immutable variables across all contracts that require them. As for circuits, none of them was needed, except for the epoch duration to be able to dimension the fees array. This was handled by introducing a new MAX_EPOCH_DURATION constant (32) which sets the max length of the array. This is a prerequisite to #9809
spalladino
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 8, 2024
De-enshrines the following constants and turns them into config: ``` ETHEREUM_SLOT_DURATION = 12; AZTEC_SLOT_DURATION = 24; AZTEC_EPOCH_DURATION = 16; AZTEC_TARGET_COMMITTEE_SIZE = 48; AZTEC_EPOCH_PROOF_CLAIM_WINDOW_IN_L2_SLOTS = 13; ``` These can now be set via env vars. On L1, they are set as immutable variables across all contracts that require them. As for circuits, none of them was needed, except for the epoch duration to be able to dimension the fees array. This was handled by introducing a new MAX_EPOCH_DURATION constant (32) which sets the max length of the array. This is a prerequisite to #9809
spalladino
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 8, 2024
De-enshrines the following constants and turns them into config: ``` ETHEREUM_SLOT_DURATION = 12; AZTEC_SLOT_DURATION = 24; AZTEC_EPOCH_DURATION = 16; AZTEC_TARGET_COMMITTEE_SIZE = 48; AZTEC_EPOCH_PROOF_CLAIM_WINDOW_IN_L2_SLOTS = 13; ``` These can now be set via env vars. On L1, they are set as immutable variables across all contracts that require them. As for circuits, none of them was needed, except for the epoch duration to be able to dimension the fees array. This was handled by introducing a new MAX_EPOCH_DURATION constant (32) which sets the max length of the array. This is a prerequisite to #9809
spalladino
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 8, 2024
De-enshrines the following constants and turns them into config: ``` ETHEREUM_SLOT_DURATION = 12; AZTEC_SLOT_DURATION = 24; AZTEC_EPOCH_DURATION = 16; AZTEC_TARGET_COMMITTEE_SIZE = 48; AZTEC_EPOCH_PROOF_CLAIM_WINDOW_IN_L2_SLOTS = 13; ``` These can now be set via env vars. On L1, they are set as immutable variables across all contracts that require them. As for circuits, none of them was needed, except for the epoch duration to be able to dimension the fees array. This was handled by introducing a new MAX_EPOCH_DURATION constant (32) which sets the max length of the array. This is a prerequisite to #9809
spalladino
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 8, 2024
De-enshrines the following constants and turns them into config: ``` ETHEREUM_SLOT_DURATION = 12; AZTEC_SLOT_DURATION = 24; AZTEC_EPOCH_DURATION = 16; AZTEC_TARGET_COMMITTEE_SIZE = 48; AZTEC_EPOCH_PROOF_CLAIM_WINDOW_IN_L2_SLOTS = 13; ``` These can now be set via env vars. On L1, they are set as immutable variables across all contracts that require them. As for circuits, none of them was needed, except for the epoch duration to be able to dimension the fees array. This was handled by introducing a new MAX_EPOCH_DURATION constant (32) which sets the max length of the array. This is a prerequisite to #9809
spalladino
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 8, 2024
De-enshrines the following constants and turns them into config: ``` ETHEREUM_SLOT_DURATION = 12; AZTEC_SLOT_DURATION = 24; AZTEC_EPOCH_DURATION = 16; AZTEC_TARGET_COMMITTEE_SIZE = 48; AZTEC_EPOCH_PROOF_CLAIM_WINDOW_IN_L2_SLOTS = 13; ``` These can now be set via env vars. On L1, they are set as immutable variables across all contracts that require them. As for circuits, none of them was needed, except for the epoch duration to be able to dimension the fees array. This was handled by introducing a new MAX_EPOCH_DURATION constant (32) which sets the max length of the array. This is a prerequisite to #9809
spalladino
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 9, 2024
De-enshrines the following constants and turns them into config: ``` ETHEREUM_SLOT_DURATION = 12; AZTEC_SLOT_DURATION = 24; AZTEC_EPOCH_DURATION = 16; AZTEC_TARGET_COMMITTEE_SIZE = 48; AZTEC_EPOCH_PROOF_CLAIM_WINDOW_IN_L2_SLOTS = 13; ``` These can now be set via env vars. On L1, they are set as immutable variables across all contracts that require them. As for circuits, none of them was needed, except for the epoch duration to be able to dimension the fees array. This was handled by introducing a new MAX_EPOCH_DURATION constant (32) which sets the max length of the array. This is a prerequisite to #9809
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
We have hit an error in a long running manual test caused by a race condition between the last block in an epoch and its corresponding proof. We want to build a suite of tests that runs considerably faster and can reproduce this kind of issues.
We need to de-enshrine epoch and slot durations as constants, and create an e2e test that uses very fast slots and small epochs. This test should manipulate sequencer and prover nodes so that their txs land on specific L1 blocks, to test different combinations, starting with the one that triggered the error above.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: