Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Failure case of TRACE in PoseTrack video #517

Open
hongsukchoi opened this issue Oct 9, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Failure case of TRACE in PoseTrack video #517

hongsukchoi opened this issue Oct 9, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@hongsukchoi
Copy link

hongsukchoi commented Oct 9, 2024

Hi @Arthur151

Thank you for your continuous great works! I have a question about TRACE.

How can I visualize the global camera trajectories (sequential 6D camera poses)?

I have world_cams output from the trace model's function. However, I found two problems. 1) It doesn't have rotation of cameras 2) More critically, multiple camera poses are defined per frame. It violates TRACE's contribution that TRACE assumes a single world frame for one scene.

Overall, I get this kind of weird result with multiple camera trajectories. The result also shows huge misalignment between people. They all look good in the 2D rendering output, but it's bad in 3D visualization of Viser. Could you clarify if I am doing something wrong, or the result in 3D visualization is something likely to happen? I obtained camera rotations from cam_rot_motion_maps[pred_batch_ids,:,pred_czyxs[:,1],pred_czyxs[:,2]].

Screenshot 2024-10-09 at 4 38 35 PM Screenshot 2024-10-09 at 4 41 36 PM

Caution: These images are not exactly time synchronized.
Full videos:
https://youtu.be/1ER6bYZfDyY
https://youtu.be/YdAeIbQHC2c

This is my visualization code:
https://github.com/hongsukchoi/TRACE_vis/tree/hongsuk/simple_romp/trace2
https://github.com/hongsukchoi/TRACE_vis/blob/hongsuk/simple_romp/mp_global_viser_vis.py

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant