-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 66
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Minor doc and consistency issue #48
Comments
The values for the line height are just given as indication. Some user are using 0.5 , 0.6 or 0.8 mm nozzle and idealy you should use the same value as you have in your profil. So using just one height or showing just one height as example is not a good idea on my point of view. Concerning the link on the Wikipage ... Yes I had the same thought this morning :) |
Fair enough. Because i did it with 0.2 (my standard) and the layer change was not working out. So the reason being that the script default layer change works with the model size and the layer hight. But not with 0.2 or other layer hights, in which case you would have to do the maths. |
But let me start with a big thanks. This is great work, put up a paypal button i'll give you a coffee.
My problem has often been that many towers and things require Simplyfied3d to slice or manual work.
And ready towers (gcode) are made for Cartesian printers, i have a delta and so they are out of the printing area.
Ok, the first doc issues i would change is: the links to say a temp tower in the readme go to the stl, but i think it would be more helpful to link to the corresponding wiki page. I can make a pr if you want
Second, the line height does not seem consistent, i have see 0.16 (temp) and 0.2 (retract) . Ideally the scripts would pick up and do the change accordingly. Failing that (too difficult/impossible) a consistent layer hight (0.2 ?) would be preferable, and mentioned in the readme.
So thanks again
Torsten
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: