wouldn't M109 be more appropriate than m104?

[PaintOnBrush]

wouldn't "M109 R" be more appropriate than "m104 S" in the tempfantower.py script?

this would wait until the temp gets to the temperature before starting the layers.

[5axes]

I don't think so as generaly we start from the higher temperature to the lower , M109 are not usefull because we are already at an higher value so the 104 function doesn't wait anything.

[PaintOnBrush]

I find it useful to measure the ooze factor between the cooling dwell time from higher temperature to lower (I might have accentuated the top ooze blob a bit)

which would result in

the ooze blobs' diameter are easily measurable with a set of calipers too.

I've found some materials to not ooze at all at certain temps and still make strong prints with this method.

[5axes]

As in Cura the temperature change inside a print ( IE from the initial layer printing temperature and the printing temperature ) is done with a M104 S command line , I don't see exactly the benefits to test the use of the M109 R instruction and to measure the ooze blob default which should be not present if you use the M104 S instruction ?