You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
nine year old thread puzzles me a bit and I think (hope so) this is no longer the case. What Wido den Hollander says is more in my words:
The ceph.dir.rctime attribute with a high resolution Unix Epoch timestamp is updated as far as something has changed in the file system below a directory:
But this doesn't make sense in my eyes. If you want to avoid to traverse over the entire directory tree starting with top level directory /A o the ceph.dir.rctime" attribute with the newer value of the timestamp must be propagated in the extended attributes of the upper in all (ideally) directory levels /A and /A/B avoiding more traversals in sub-directories where nothing has changed, e.g:
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
Hello,
nine year old thread puzzles me a bit and I think (hope so) this is no longer the case. What Wido den Hollander says is more in my words:
The ceph.dir.rctime attribute with a high resolution Unix Epoch timestamp is updated as far as something has changed in the file system below a directory:
But this doesn't make sense in my eyes. If you want to avoid to traverse over the entire directory tree starting with top level directory /A o the ceph.dir.rctime" attribute with the newer value of the timestamp must be propagated in the extended attributes of the upper in all (ideally) directory levels /A and /A/B avoiding more traversals in sub-directories where nothing has changed, e.g:
Is it like this?
Thank you!
J
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions